ABSTRACT
Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, stroke outpatient care was transformed to telemedicine (TM) through video (VTM) and telephonic (TPH) visits. While TM offers potential benefits over in-person visits for stroke patients, accessibility of VTM may be limited for patients at highest risk for poor outcomes. We recommended VTM for all patients, but offered TPH visits if patients did not have adequate equipment or declined VTM. We examined whether demographic variables influenced the TM visit type completed (VTM vs TPH) for patients seen during the pandemic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of charts for patients seen in our stroke clinic between 3/16/20 (fully operational TM) and 5/31/20. We determined visit type: VTM vs in-person vs TPH and abstracted demographic and clinical data. We focused on TM visits and used t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-squared as appropriate for univariate analyses and logistic regression for multivariate analyses. Results: Among 463 visits, 47 in-person visits were excluded, leaving 416 (328 VTM and 88 TPH). Mean age was 61.5 and by race/ethnicity: 42.9% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 36.9% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 11.6% Hispanic, 4.3% Asian, and 4.3% other (Table 1). In univariate analyses, visit type was significantly associated with race (p = 0.024), insurance type (p=0.001), and visit type (new vs established). In adjusted analysis, NHB race was associated with 1.90 times higher odds (95% CI 1.09-3.32) of TPH vs VTM compared to NHW. Medicaid insurance was associated with 3.90 times higher odds (95% CI 1.54-9.88) of TPH vs VTM visit compared to private insurance. Conclusions: We found that NHB patients and patients with Medicaid were less likely to complete VTM visits compared to TPH. This suggests barriers to VTM based on race and insurance type and deserves further study. If video visits are superior to TPH visits for clinical care, these barriers may widen disparities in secondary stroke prevention during the pandemic.(Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Stroke care has been shown to be worse for patients presenting overnight/weekends (off-hours) to centers compare to those presenting during business hours (on-hours).Telemedicine (TM) helps provide safe management of stroke patients. The UT Teleneurology (UTT) hub provides acute neurological coverage by stroke specialists to 18 spoke centers. To our knowledge, the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on the “weekend effect” has not been studied. The objective is to compare TM consult volumes and time metrics of stroke patients who received tPA via TM off-hours with those on-hours during the pandemic. In a retrospective query of the UTT registry from 3/20 - 6/20, we identified 122 stroke patients who received tPA - 109 were included in our analysis - 2 were excluded after quality check, 11 were excluded as inpatient strokes. We compared baseline characteristics and time metrics between the off-hours (5pm-7:59am, weekends) and on-hours (weekdays 8am-4:59pm) patients (Table 1). We also compared the number of TM consults between the height of the pandemic (3/20 - 6/20) and the previous year (3/19 - 6/19). Of 109 patients, 72 were managed via TM during off-hours, 37 during on-hours. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no differences in time metrics including door to needle time. Of note, there was no difference in the number of acute TM consults or patients receiving tPA. There were fewer routine TM consults during the pandemic, and a trend toward fewer phone consults. There was no difference in time metrics between the patients treated off-hours vs on-hours in the pandemic period. TM may be advantageous over in-person neurology coverage during crises, and is consistent regardless of the hour/day. Contrary to other studies, the number of acute TM consults and patients receiving tPA did not differ between the study periods. Routine consults decreased during the pandemic - perhaps coinciding with state closure mandates/fewer hospitalized stroke patients. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Stroke is a devastating disease with high morbidity/mortality. Many studies have shown lower stroke volumes during the Covid 19 pandemic, with possible causes including fear of contracting the virus, limited hospital capacity, etc. Telemedicine (TM) helps provide safe management of stroke patients, and may be advantageous to in-person coverage during crises. The UT Teleneurology (UTT) hub provides acute neurological coverage by stroke specialists to 18 spoke centers. The impact of the pandemic on acute stroke volumes and care is ongoing and its effects should be studied further. The purpose of this study is to compare TM acute stroke volumes and time metrics between the Covid 19 era (March-June 2020) and the previous year (March-June 2019). In a retrospective query of the UTT registry from 3/19 - 6/19 and 3/20 - 6/20, we identified 294 stroke patients who received tPA - 273 were included in our analysis - 4 were excluded after quality check, 17 were excluded as inpatient strokes. We compared baseline and clinical characteristics, volumes, and time metrics between the periods (table 1). Of the 273 patients, 172 received tPA via TM during the 2019 period and 109 received tPA via TM during the 2020 period. Baseline and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups except for race. Of note, there were no differences in acute TM volumes or the number of patients receiving tPA. There was no difference in most metrics, including door to needle time. During the pandemic, camera to needle time was longer (3 minutes), and there was a trend towards longer last well to door time. There were no differences in the volume of acute TM consults, the number of patients receiving tPA, or door to needle time between the pandemic period and the previous year. Camera to needle time was slightly longer during the pandemic, perhaps representing more demands on hospital staff. The trend towards longer last well to door time could be due to public fear of presenting to the hospital during a deadly pandemic. (Figure Presented).